Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Welcome to the Charlie Tango DX Group. The home of ALL things Radio - CB, 11m DX, Amateur, PMR446, PLD, Network and Data. We welcome all radio enthusiasts of all knowledge levels. Join today and claim your own unique World Famous CT Call-sign
XMAS COMPETITION: Win a Brand New Yaesu ft891 with Wideband Modification and to help the winner use it we are including a 30 Amp Power Supply on top. This is our biggest prize yet. All this could be yours for Christmas for just £20. - See Latest News Forum for details.
Latest Buxton 2020 News: Unfortunately, due to the Covid-19 pandemic we have had to cancel this year's Buxton date. Sorry for any inconvenience.
Call Sign : 26-CT-3515 Posts : 61 Times Thanked : 3 Join date : 2020-05-03 QTH or Location : Epping, Essex Equipment Used : President McKinley on Antron 99, Uniden UBC785XLT on ScanKing Royal Discone, Motorola XTN446
Subject: SWR - how high is too high? Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:05 pm
Hi All,
I’m looking for advice as to whether I’m being too precious with SWR and in doing so, costing myself Watts.
Across most of the frequencies I use, I have an SWR of 1:1. Max 1.4 : 1 at the high end of my rig’s range. I have a Zetagi TM999 in-line which is a Wattmeter, SWR meter and matcher all-in-one. Now, when running low power, SWR of 1.4:1 would not bother me enough to use the matcher. However, when running a linear, I use the matcher to pull it down closer to 1:1. However, upon doing so the Wattmeter falls from 80W to 60W, (as example). Probability not the most accurate meter, however, am I concerning myself too much with the SWR v’s the linear’s transistors? Would you guys just roll with the 1.4:1? Is it even worth using the matcher for 1.4:1 ?
Any thoughts or advice greatly appreciated as always,
Call Sign : 26 CT050 26 FB080 26 WT105 26 TE171 Posts : 717 Times Thanked : 44 Join date : 2019-06-27 QTH or Location : NORTH LONDON Equipment Used : ORIGINAL President Lincoln, Midland 8001XT, President Teddy , Silver Eagle microphones , Gainmaster antenna, use a AMP ofcourse I do sometimes Age : 62
Subject: Re: SWR - how high is too high? Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:17 pm
As long as it doesn't go over 1.5 when using the amp your ok ,in fact on normal radio power even up to SWR of 2.0 is ok really just not as effective if it was lower, basically the lower the SWR the better,as for a matcher its doesn't actually lower your SWR it just lies to the radio in to thinking its lower .
Last edited by NUBSTER on Fri Aug 14, 2020 7:15 am; edited 1 time in total
Call Sign : 26-CT-3515 Posts : 61 Times Thanked : 3 Join date : 2020-05-03 QTH or Location : Epping, Essex Equipment Used : President McKinley on Antron 99, Uniden UBC785XLT on ScanKing Royal Discone, Motorola XTN446
Subject: Re: SWR - how high is too high? Wed Aug 12, 2020 11:53 pm
Thanks NUBSTER, Yes, it just “creates” a match. (Absorbs the reflected power, by minor tweaks to impedance I assume........) Paracetamol for radios
Call Sign : 43-CT-016 Posts : 122 Times Thanked : 7 Join date : 2019-11-17 QTH or Location : Perth Equipment Used : iCom IC-7610/IC-9700
Subject: Re: SWR - how high is too high? Tue Nov 10, 2020 9:02 am
The Doctor wrote:
Thanks NUBSTER, Yes, it just “creates” a match. (Absorbs the reflected power, by minor tweaks to impedance I assume........) Paracetamol for radios
Thanks for your reply. Rory
All the tuner (Really poor name for them, BTW!) is doing is presenting a near 50 ohm load to radio, nothing more. The SWR between tuner and antenna is still whatever it was before.
People will argue all day about the efficiency of resonant vs non-resonant antennas, so I won't even go there....
Call Sign : 163-CT-220...MW7TTA Posts : 469 Times Thanked : 15 Join date : 2019-11-19 QTH or Location : Holyhead Equipment Used : Yaesu FT-991A.
Subject: Re: SWR - how high is too high? Tue Nov 10, 2020 9:59 am
The best tuner in the world can't adjust the physical length of the antenna. I just fools the transceiver into seeing a 50 Ohm load. I think i am correct but i could be wrong as i am falling to bit's